While the report identifies serious threats, it also points toward practical solutions.
One promising area involves protecting bat roosts in historic monuments. “Natural caves have been destroyed in many areas, so these monuments have become bat habitats,” Chakravarty says. Yet protection can be complicated. “The bat lives in a protected habitat, but the bat itself is not protected,” he says.
Beyond site protection, the report calls for expanded monitoring, stronger policy support, habitat restoration, and greater public awareness. Prakash hopes future efforts will identify local threats more clearly. “We are lacking in our understanding of all the threats bat species face locally and how it is impacting their population,” he says. “In the next couple of years, I hope we identify such critical threats and work toward mitigating them.”
Ultimately, the report argues that bat conservation is about far more than protecting individual species. As Chakravarty puts it, “Bat conservation is not just a forest department problem or an environment ministry problem. It’s a problem that touches upon and intersects with a lot of human-centered topics like pest control and diseases. Therefore, bat conservation should also be a priority of other government bodies.”
Those connections extend well beyond ecology. “Bat conservation is not a problem of just environmental conservation,” Chakravarty adds. “It links to human health, it links to human economics, it links to human societies, and with that recognition, all of us have a role to play.”